Prediction of Regina Marsikova vs Zenda Liess Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
R. Marsikova vs Z. Liess

Regina Marsikova

CZE

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Zenda Liess

USA

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Marsikova 2 - 0 Liess

They have played 5 sets in total, with Regina Marsikova winning 4 and Zenda Liess winning 1. The last match between Regina Marsikova and Zenda Liess was at the US Open, 28-08-1978, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Regina Marsikova getting the victory 6-4 6-1.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Marsikova	2
Liess	0

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(R3) US Open(08-28-78)

Stats

Regina Marsikova

Zenda Liess

(F) Stuart(03-29-78)

Stats

Regina Marsikova

Zenda Liess

R. Marsikova vs Z. Liess H2H Profile

R. Marsikova	Stats	Z. Liess
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
60.27% (358-236)	Career Total W/L	49.32% (72-74)
1	Clay	0
1	Hard	0
7	Titles	0
2	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

R. Marsikova vs Z. Liess Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Regina Marsikova has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Zenda Liess has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Regina Marsikova, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Zenda Liess has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Regina Marsikova has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zenda Liess has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Regina Marsikova has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Zenda Liess winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Regina Marsikova has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 65% (W/L 93/51), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 59% (W/L 26/18). Zenda Liess has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 65% (W/L 15/12), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/2).
Player level: In the last year, Regina Marsikova has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Zenda Liess has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Regina Marsikova winning 2 times and Zenda Liess being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Regina Marsikova winning 4 and Zenda Liess winning 1.
The last match between Regina Marsikova and Zenda Liess was at the US Open, 28-08-1978, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Regina Marsikova getting the victory 6-4 6-1.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Regina Marsikova has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Zenda Liess has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Regina Marsikova has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zenda Liess has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Regina Marsikova has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zenda Liess has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Regina Marsikova vs Zenda Liess Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

R. Marsikova vs Z. Liess H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

R. Marsikova	Stats	Z. Liess
2	H2H Matches Won	0
4	Sets Won	1
25	Games Won	17
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (2/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/2)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

R. Marsikova Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
ITF Karlovy Vary - 13-09-1993
R3 Andrea StrnadovaA. Strnadova	L	6-0 7-5	Stats
Prague - 13-07-1993
Q2 Leona LaskovaL. Laskova	L	6-1 6-1	Stats
Q1 Marketa StuskovaM. Stuskova	W	7-6 2-6 6-3	Stats
Lucerne - 18-05-1992
Q2 Lindsay DavenportL. Davenport	L	7-5 6-0	Stats
Q1 Joana MantaJ. Manta	W	7-6(6) 6-2	Stats

View All

Z. Liess Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Tampa - 10-11-1980
R2 Anne WhiteA. White	L	6-3 6-2	Stats
Deerfield Beach - 13-10-1980
R3 Paula SmithP. Smith	L	6-2 6-0	Stats
Q3 Felicia HutnickF. Hutnick	W	6-1 6-1	Stats
Q1 Nancy OrnsteinN. Ornstein	W	7-5 7-6	Stats
Q2 Lisa SassanoL. Sassano	W	6-4 6-7 7-6	Stats

View All

R. Marsikova vs Z. Liess Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

R. Marsikova	Stats	Z. Liess
60.27% (358/236)	YTD Win/Loss	49.32% (72/74)
58.08% (780/563)	Sets Win/Loss	50.00% (163/163)
100.00% (6538/0)	Games Win/Loss	49.33% (1464/1504)
60.19% (65/43)	Hard Win/Loss	45.71% (16/19)
65.07% (136/73)	Clay Win/Loss	52.83% (28/25)
42.70% (38/51)	Indoor Hard W/L	42.86% (12/16)
59.09% (26/18)	Grass Win/Loss	33.33% (1/2)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
215.59	Average Opponent Rank	100.94
66.67% (4/2)	Slam W/L	50.00% (1/1)
71.43% (5/2)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
76.47% (26/8)	Challenger W/L	50.00% (2/2)
63.85% (83/47)	Futures W/L	53.33% (8/7)
61% (350/576)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	49% (70/142)
100% (1/1)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/0)
50% (12/24)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/0)
59% (107/180)	Deciding Set Win %	45% (19/42)
88% (338/297)	1st Set Won, Won Match	80% (79/63)
12% (338/39)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	20% (79/16)
23% (246/57)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	11% (63/7)